CricketArchive

f98
Surrey v Hampshire
First-Class matches in England 1789
VenueMoulsey Hurst on 30th, 31st July, 1st August 1789 (3-day match)
Balls per over4
TossToss not known
ResultSurrey won by 221 runs
Close of play day 1
Close of play day 2

Surrey first inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
Earl of Winchilseab Taylor32     
G Talbotb Smith24     
Vincentb Taylor7     
Butcherb Taylor28     
E Stevensb Taylor0     
H Walkerrun out47     
T Sueterb Taylor23     
J Wellsb Neale80     
Bonicknot out2     
T Ingramb Smith20     
J Walkerc Nyren b [unknown]13     
Extras(9 b)9
Total(all out)285
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-285
Hampshire bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Taylor???5--
Smith???2--
Neale???1--

Hampshire first inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
TA Smithc Ingram b [unknown]20     
J Nealec H Walker b [unknown]12     
E Halec H Walker b [unknown]2     
J Nyrenb Stevens20     
J Small senb Bonick2     
J Small junc Ingram b [unknown]30     
Carpenterc J Walker b [unknown]2     
T Taylorb Stevens0     
Horseynot out0     
A Freemantlerun out28     
Whiteb Stevens4     
Extras(6 b)6
Total(all out)126
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-126
Surrey bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Stevens???3--
Bonick???1--

Surrey second inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
Earl of Winchilseac J Small jun b [unknown]1     
G Talbotb Smith6     
Vincentc Smith b [unknown]29     
H Walkerb Flint47     
T Sueternot out33     
T Ingramnot out54     
J Walkerrun out4     
Butcherdid not bat      
E Stevensdid not bat      
J Wellsdid not bat      
Bonickdid not bat      
Extras(2 b)2
Total(5 wickets, declared)176
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?
Hampshire bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Smith???1--
Flint???1--

Hampshire second inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
TA Smithc Ingram b [unknown]0     
J Nealerun out22     
E Halec Ingram b [unknown]9     
J Nyrenc Ingram b [unknown]0     
J Small senb Ingram48     
J Small junb Stevens3     
Carpenterc J Walker b [unknown]1     
T Taylorb Ingram23     
Horseyb Ingram0     
A Freemantlec Vincent b [unknown]2     
Whitenot out4     
Extras(2 b)2
Total(all out)114
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-114
Surrey bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Stevens???1--
Ingram???3--

Notes
--> Hampshire full substitute: Flint for unknown
--> Bonick made his debut in first-class matches
--> E Hale made his debut in first-class matches
--> Carpenter made his debut in first-class matches
--> White made his debut in first-class matches
--> Flint made his debut in first-class matches
--> Flint made his last appearance in first-class matches
--> Vincent made his last appearance in first-class matches
--> Bonick made his last appearance in first-class matches
--> Carpenter made his last appearance in first-class matches
--> Horsey made his last appearance in first-class matches
--> J Wells (1) passed his previous highest score of 37 in first-class matches
--> TA Smith (1) passed his previous highest score of 10 in first-class matches
--> A Freemantle (1) passed his previous highest score of 11 in first-class matches
--> Vincent (2) passed his previous highest score of 12 in first-class matches
--> T Ingram (2) passed his previous highest score of 40 in first-class matches
--> J Neale (2) passed his previous highest score of 12 in first-class matches
--> T Taylor equalled his best innings bowling analysis in first-class matches in the Surrey first innings
--> T Taylor reached 50 wickets in first-class matches when taking his 3rd wicket in the Surrey first innings
--> T Ingram achieved his best innings bowling analysis in first-class matches in the Hampshire second innings

Surrey appear to have given up their second innings: this has been treated as a declaration, although the laws of the day did not provide for such an act. Flint apparently bowled H Walker in Surrey (2) and he has therefore been shown as a full sub for Hampshire (in place of whom is not known), although he does not appear to have batted in Hampshire (2). He had appeared for Surrey in a colts match so maybe he was a local man brought into the Hampshire side in emergency. All versions of the score have Nyland playing for Hampshire. No player of this name is known, but throughout the career of R Nyren it is found in reports as a fairly common variant of his surname. Given that R Nyren was now 55, it has been assumed to be J Nyren, who appeared in the equivalent match in 1788. White of Andover - assumed not to be the same as W White. Carpenter of Alresford. Altogether this is a strange game with big names on both sides but also some notable absentees and a large number of fringe players. A number of participants (Carpenter, Flint, Freemantle, Smith, Talbot, Vincent, J Walker, Winchilsea) also appeared in the colts match between these counties in June (SB p90), in which several of them did well.
One newspaper has T Walker playing in this match, but two others give J Walker (who had played for Surrey earlier in 1789) and this is accepted.

 

 

 

 

This page was created by the CricketArchive Oracles

LATEST SCORES

| Privacy Policy | FAQs | Contact |
Copyright © 2003-2018 CricketArchive